SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Najpopularniejsze domeny dla Twojej firmy w nazwa.pl (reklama)
Myślisz o zdobyciu zagranicznych rynków? Chcesz mieć adresy WWW w najbardziej rozpoznawalnych domenach? A może chciałbyś zabezpieczyć swoją markę przed wykorzystaniem jej przez kogoś innego? Powinieneś więc rozważyć rejestrację firmowych adresów WWW zawierających najpopularniejsze rozszerzenia używane na świecie.

 

messageID:553560007026
author:Tejun Heo
title:Re PATCH 3 5 dm relax ordering of bio bas
On Mon, Aug 30 2010 at 5:58am -0400, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: Unlike REQ_HARDBARRIER, REQ_FLUSH/FUA doesnt mandate any ordering against other bios. This patch relaxes ordering around flushes. * A flush bio is no longer deferred to workqueue directly. Its processed like other bios but __split_and_process_bio() uses md- flush_bio as the clone source. md- flush_bio is initialized to empty flush during md initialization and shared for all flushes. * When dec_pending() detects that a flush has completed, it checks whether the original bio has data. If so, the bio is queued to the deferred list w/ REQ_FLUSH cleared; otherwise, its completed. * As flush sequencing is handled in the usual issue/completion path, dm_wq_work() no longer needs to handle flushes differently. Now its only responsibility is re-issuing deferred bios the same way as _dm_request() would. REQ_FLUSH handling logic including process_flush() is dropped. * Theres no reason for queue_io() and dm_wq_work() write lock dm- io_lock. queue_io() now only uses md- deferred_lock and dm_wq_work() read locks dm- io_lock. * bios no longer need to be queued on the deferred list while a flush is in progress making DMF_QUEUE_IO_TO_THREAD unncessary. Drop it. This avoids stalling the device during flushes and simplifies the implementation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx Looks good overall. @@ -144,11 +143,6 @@ struct mapped_device { spinlock_t deferred_lock; /* - * An error from the flush request currently being processed. - */ - int flush_error; - - /* * Protect barrier_error from concurrent endio processing * in request-based dm. */ Could you please document why it is OK to remove flush_error in the patch header? The -EOPNOTSUPP handling removal (done in patch 2) obviously helps enable this but it is not clear how the num_flush_requests flushes that __clone_and_map_flush() generates do not need explicit DM error handling. Other than that. Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at rel="nofollow" vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Index